This week, Google has released the first version of Android App Inventor, a tool for visually developing applications for Android powered devices.
Being as I develop another visual software development tool (Illumination Software Creator), I’ve received a rather hefty pile of emails from people asking me my thoughts on it.
Let me be frank: I couldn’t be happier about it. I am, in a word, thrilled.
Any tool that helps to make computing fun and accessible to more people is A-OK in my book!
Along those lines: I don’t view App Inventor as a direct competitor to Illumination Software Creator in any way.
Google’s Android App Inventor is really a pretty standard development environment. It includes a nice, straight forward visual designer to lay out the look and feel of your application. And, likewise, it includes a pretty straight forward, run of the mill, programming language.
The key differentiator, from “standard” programming tools, being that you don’t actually type your code, you drag and drop pieces of your code and lock them together. (The “code editor” is based on the, very cool, Scratch — which is focused on making it easier to teach children programming and logic.)
Illumination Software Creator takes an entirely different approach — self contained “blocks’ that can be linked together without any restrictions.
In this regard using Illumination to create an application is much like playing with lego building blocks.
Whereas using Android App Inventor to create an application is much like… well… programming an application… with a mouse instead of a keyboard.
The approach of the two is almost night and day different… and both are worth while in my opinion.
Android App Inventor even has the, extremely cool, feature of being able to live debug your applications on your phone as you build them. I declare that “Super Neat-O”.
Overall, I am overjoyed. An attempt at bringing Android smartphone development to anyone who has an urge to tinker. I love it.
Another big plus, in my book, is that App Inventor is supported on Linux, Windows and MacOS X (just like Illumination Software Creator). Cross platform support is a big deal in my mind. Providing people and organizations with the freedom to choose their own platform is critical.
Which brings my to the big downside to App Inventor — It is focused on one single target platform (Android). That really is my only big complaint, and is a key piece what will, in the long run, dramatically limit App Inventor’s usefulness.
That’s really the key big difference between App Inventor (Android only) and Illumination Software Creator (Mac, Windows, Linux, Nokia Tablets, Adobe Flash/Flex Websites and, soon, Haiku-OS).
(That screenshot on the right is Illumination Software Creator… not App Inventor. That’ll give you an idea of the workflow and design differences of the two visual programming tools.)
I certainly understand Google’s interest in furthering and focusing on Android, I just find that limitation… limiting. This is the same basic limitation that, say, using X-Code to write iPhone applications creates.
What happens when you want to run your software on another platform? Can’t. Stuck. Time to re-write from scratch (or mostly from scratch). I am lazy. I don’t want to have to re-write something I’ve already written.
But, that aside, App Inventor looks great. I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to dabble in Android development.
That is, of course, until Illumination Software Creator releases official support for building Android apps. Then using App Inventor will be just plain silly.

July 14th, 2010 - 1:33 am
“and, soon, Haiku-OS).” Ah…so as predicted, it is Haiku, cool.
I do have to admit though…I do hope this tool helps dramatically in prototyping android apps…the current XML that devs are forced to muck about in is horrid (and the current visual editor is worse).
July 19th, 2010 - 10:46 am
Another downside of AppInventor is that it requires you to own an Android phone in order to do any programming (As far as I can tell). This sounds like a non-issue till you get to the part about how Google is hoping for AppInventor to be used in CS0 (“Intro to CS for Non-Majors”) type classes, at which point one either (1) asks the school to spring for $600/handset hardware for a room full of 20-30 people, or (2) asks the students to individually spring for a $600 handset for a class that they’re not majoring in. At least with (2) some students might be willing to (re)sign a 2 year contract with a carrier to knock the price down to $100-$200, but that’s still steep for a ‘non-majors’ class.
If only they made the AppInventor output seemlessly run in an emulator :/
August 28th, 2010 - 1:07 am
I heared about app inventor, but not available yet. I will be installing ISC as soon as I get home.