Oh good. Linux Hater has replied to my challenge to stop being anonymous and debate me.
And, look at that, it is a numbered list of excuses why he isn’t going to man up.
Because it sounds like fun, I’m going to quote his entire post and reply to each item inline…
“I feel like I’ve given this Lunduke fellow too much credit.”
A classic mistake. Land-war in China. Etc. Etc.
“A challenge? really?”
Yep.
“Let me point out a few things:”
Ok. Ready. Fire away.
“1. You take yourself waaay too seriously. Imagine what a twat I’d look like if I went after every other person that talked shit about my blog. And just so you know, I don’t fucking follow your blog OK? Some reader sent me the link to your video. He probably felt sorry for you.”
Allow me to respond to this single list item with a few thoughts:
- This is really like 4 (or 5 depending on how you count) points all under item “1″.
- Nobody is talking about you responding to everyone who “talked shit” about your blog.
- Also, worth pointing out, the entire purpose of your blog is to “talk shit”.
- Finally, on the whole “you not following my blog” front… the phrase “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” comes to mind.
“2. You clearly don’t get the point of this blog.”
That is entirely possible. Though, and I’m going out on a limb here, the point seems to be “being cranky about Linux (and Linux-related topics and people)”.
It’s either that or “an excuse to call people names in a completely anonymous fashion under the guise of disliking a particular piece of software”.
“3. You also clearly don’t get the point of me being anonymous. Do you really think I want freetards hassling me in my real life? I just want a place to voice my frustrations. It’s all o’y'all that are having a hissy fit over it. Do you think I want dialogue? Think again lundude. I’m done trying to talk to freetards.”
I fully get the point of you being anonymous. You want to call people names but not have to face those individuals directly or deal with the results.
I just think it’s incredibly un-cool.
As for the whole “It’s all o’y'all that are having a hissy fit over it” remark… it’s worth pointing out that you fired the first shot here sir/ma’am.
It is incredibly obvious that you are seeking a reaction. And there is absolutely nothing wrong with that at all. If you have a message you want to get out, it’s helpful to go about it in such a way as to draw a crowd.
That said…
If a man goes running down main street wearing nothing but a Tu-Tu and banging cymbals together… it would be pretty retarded of him to say “can you believe people looked at me when I did that and had an opinion about it?!”.
“4. Also, if you haven’t noticed, freetards are notoriously terrible at separating an argument from the person making it. So why the fuck would I give them any opportunity to dismiss me just because of who I am or what I do for a living.”
… “freetards are notoriously terrible at separating an argument from the person making it”?
Not that I’m going to disagree with you here… I know the kind of person you’re talking about (I’ve lamented their attitudes on the Linux Action Show many times myself). But… Here’s a quote from you in your initial reaction to the video:
“Your audience is more retarded than you are.”
I’m going to go ahead and put your two quotes back to back here… just for kicks:
“freetards are notoriously terrible at separating an argument from the person making it”
“Your audience is more retarded than you are.”
Oh. Hey there Mr Pot. Meet Mr Kettle. Mr Pot! What did you just call Mr Kettle? Well that’s… that’s a really weird thing for you to call Mr Kettle…
“5. It’s nice that you have nice balls. I still think I make better points. Also, I do it without wasting 30 minutes of peoples time by making them watch your inability to deal with xrandr.”
…
I need to start a quotes section of my blog.
“you have nice balls” – Linux Hater
“If you want to make some points, why don’t you write them on your lame blog. Then, if I feel so inclined, I’ll write some stuff on my lame blog. We will make it impossible for our readers to follow. Isn’t that how you freetards do it?”
When I want to make some points I do so on this blog here. Or on the Linux Action Show. Or I go on other podcasts. Or I get up in front of people and talk at conferences.
All of which, it is worth pointing out, I do with my own name.
Why? A few reasons:
- I believe in the things I say.
- I want to see things improve. There is nothing to be gained, in this regard, by staying anonymous.
- I am not a little girl throwing a temper tantrum.
The offer still stands. If you’d like to man up and debate me face to face (or via video conference), I’ll do it on your terms (you can decide on the format, the ground rules, the time, etc.).
We can also do it on any of a wide variety of topics that relate to your little blog and my (vast array) of media outlets I contribute to.
How about a debate on how the format of your blog is either helpful or harmful to the Linux (and software in general) world? Just an idea…